<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rhetorical Question Mark</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mikefigueroa.com/blog/2009/06/rhetorical-question-mark/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mikefigueroa.com/blog/2009/06/rhetorical-question-mark/</link>
	<description>Figgalicous</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 22:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: mom</title>
		<link>http://mikefigueroa.com/blog/2009/06/rhetorical-question-mark/#comment-430</link>
		<dc:creator>mom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 21:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikefigueroa.com/blog/?p=610#comment-430</guid>
		<description>The implied ? mark is a strange deal when reading rather than speaking since the speaker can downplay the need for an answer to a non-question. I think the new design should be implemented to eliminate the confusion!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The implied ? mark is a strange deal when reading rather than speaking since the speaker can downplay the need for an answer to a non-question. I think the new design should be implemented to eliminate the confusion!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
